A while ago - around the beginning of August there was a thread about exceptions and if could take on siblings even if only had one place available.
I expressed my view but there was difference of opinion - and so because I did not want others to act on my personal view, I emailed my contact at Ofsted to get Ofsted's view so we could all be clear.
This is the email I sent
Dear
My apologies for sending another email but I do not know who else to ask about this.
I have a reputation for understanding EYFS 12 - which I do - and as a result other childminders tend to ask me questions. However I have responded to one question and some others have questioned my understanding of one aspect of exceptions.
I have explained that each of us is responsible for our own decisions about exceptions - and that we must comply with all requirements of EYFS 12 and follow the guidance document issued by Ofsted.
This is understood as is the fact that my assessment may be different to others due to my experience / the children in my care and so on. So everyone is agreed that they must decide themselves and be accountable for their decisions.
The problem lies with my personal interpretation about the care of siblings in the following situation.
Parent has two under fives and wants to place both children with the same childminder. In her area both childminder A and childminder B have one space for an under five child and there are no childminders with 2 under five spaces.
Parent would like to send both children to childminder A because childminder B can not provide care for all her work shifts
My understanding is that childminder A - could agree to care for both children for the follow reasons
She has one space for one child - so clear cut
The other child is a sibling and the parent can not find suitable hours or two spaces locally.
She has risk assessed and is confident that she can meet all the needs of all the children
She has discussed with the parents already using her service and they have no concerns
She is maintaining the overall ratio's - the maximum number of children in her care would be 4 children under 5 and will not exceed 6 under 8 at any one time
It is not long term
She has all the equipment needed and space in her car for another car seat.
I believe this is the honest and professional way to assess this scenario - and my understanding is it is within the 'rules' for exceptions.
I also believe that some childminders would not deal with a scenario such as this so honestly or professionally because they would take on the first child - then a week or two later grant themselves an exception to care for the second child on the grounds of continuity of care for a sibling.
My professional view is that to take on one child because you have a space but to not initially take on the second child would not be in the best interests of the parent or either of the children - due to separation issues, extra stress for parent (two children with two childminders) and could not only be confusing but detrimental to the children's emotional well being to be move childcare setting after such a short period of time.
As I say I believe it would be better to be honest, and take on both children even though only have one space - much the same as would do for twins.
However - as other childminders have questioned my understanding and my rational for it - I would be grateful if you could give me Ofsted's view - so that I can either admit to misunderstanding the 'rules' and to state Ofsted's view or to give reassurance than if meeting all other requirements of EYFS - that a childminder could take on siblings even if only have one space.
I have copied Sarah Neville in as she is aware of the questions being asked
This is the reply I received today (please note apology for delay)
Dear Penny
So sorry for the delay in replying. I think your view is right and in line with our guidance. The main thing childminders must do is consider in each particular case where they choose to take on extra children their rationale for doing so – it must be an exceptional circumstance and in the best interest of children. It is not in the best interests of anyone to take on one child first and then another later.
Best wishes
I hope this helps with everyone's understanding
Penny
Bookmarks